Return to site

Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download

broken image


  1. Beck Anxiety Inventory Printable
  2. Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Pc
  3. Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Windows 10
  4. Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download
  5. Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Pdf
Part of a series on
Psychology
  • Cognitive/Cognitivism
  • Personality
  • Beck depression inventory PDF download.Beck's Depression Inventory. This depression inventory can be self-scored. The scoring scale is at the end of the questionnaire. 0 I do not feel sad.
  • The Beck Depression Inventory–Second Edi- tion (BDI-II) is the current version of an instrument used for more than 50 years to determine the level of depression.

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, BDI-1A, BDI-II), created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choiceself-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression. Its development marked a shift among mental health professionals, who had until then, viewed depression from a psychodynamic perspective, instead of it being rooted in the patient's own thoughts.

In its current version, the BDI-II is designed for individuals aged 13 and over, and is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression such as hopelessness and irritability, cognitions such as guilt or feelings of being punished, as well as physical symptoms such as fatigue, weight loss, and lack of interest in sex.[1]

There are three versions of the BDI—the original BDI, first published in 1961 and later revised in 1978 as the BDI-1A, and the BDI-II, published in 1996. The BDI is widely used as an assessment tool by health care professionals and researchers in a variety of settings.

Evaluated the Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire (HDSQ; Metalsky & Joiner, 1991). The HDSQ is a 32-item self-report measure of eight symptoms posited by L. Metalsky, and L. Alloy (1989) to comprise a specific subtype of depression—hopelessness depression.

The BDI was used as a model for the development of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), first published in 1979 by clinical psychologist Maria Kovacs.[2]

  • 1Development and history

Development and history[edit]

Historically, depression was described in psychodynamic terms as 'inverted hostility against the self'.[3] By contrast, the BDI was developed in a novel way for its time; by collating patients' verbatim descriptions of their symptoms and then using these to structure a scale which could reflect the intensity or severity of a given symptom.[1]

Beck drew attention to the importance of 'negative cognitions' described as sustained, inaccurate, and often intrusive negative thoughts about the self.[4] In his view, it was the case that these cognitions caused depression, rather than being generated by depression.

Beck developed a triad of negative cognitions about the world, the future, and the self, which play a major role in depression.An example of the triad in action taken from Brown (1995) is the case of a student obtaining poor exam results:

  • The student has negative thoughts about the world, so he may come to believe he does not enjoy the class.
  • The student has negative thoughts about his future because he thinks he may not pass the class.
  • The student has negative thoughts about his self, as he may feel he does not deserve to be in college.[5]

The development of the BDI reflects that in its structure, with items such as 'I have lost all of my interest in other people' to reflect the world, 'I feel discouraged about the future' to reflect the future, and 'I blame myself for everything bad that happens' to reflect the self. The view of depression as sustained by intrusive negative cognitions has had particular application in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which aims to challenge and neutralize them through techniques such as cognitive restructuring.

BDI[edit]

The original BDI, first published in 1961,[6] consisted of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last week. Each question had a set of at least four possible responses, ranging in intensity. For example:

  • (0) I do not feel sad.
  • (1) I feel sad.
  • (2) I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it.
  • (3) I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it.

When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-off scores were as follows:[7]

  • 0–13: indicates minimal depression
  • 14–19: indicates mild depression
  • 20–28: indicates moderate depression
  • 29–63: indicates severe depression.

Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Some items on the original BDI had more than one statement marked with the same score. For instance, there are two responses under the Mood heading that score a 2: (2a) 'I am blue or sad all the time and I can't snap out of it' and (2b) 'I am so sad or unhappy that it is very painful'.[1]

BDI-IA[edit]

The BDI-IA was a revision of the original instrument developed by Beck during the 1970s, and copyrighted in 1978. To improve ease of use, the 'a and b statements' described above were removed, and respondents were instructed to endorse how they had been feeling during the preceding two weeks.[8][9] The internal consistency for the BDI-IA was good, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of around 0.85, meaning that the items on the inventory are highly correlated with each other.[10]

However, this version retained some flaws; the BDI-IA only addressed six out of the nine DSM-III criteria for depression. This and other criticisms were addressed in the BDI-II.

BDI-II[edit]

The BDI-II was a 1996 revision of the BDI,[9] developed in response to the American Psychiatric Association's publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, which changed many of the diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder.

Items involving changes in body image, hypochondriasis, and difficulty working were replaced. Also, sleep loss and appetite loss items were revised to assess both increases and decreases in sleep and appetite. All but three of the items were reworded; only the items dealing with feelings of being punished, thoughts about suicide, and interest in sex remained the same. Finally, participants were asked to rate how they have been feeling for the past two weeks, as opposed to the past week as in the original BDI.

Beck Anxiety Inventory Printable

Like the BDI, the BDI-II also contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs used differ from the original:

  • 0–13: minimal depression
  • 14–19: mild depression
  • 20–28: moderate depression
  • 29–63: severe depression.[11]
Beck

One measure of an instrument's usefulness is to see how closely it agrees with another similar instrument that has been validated against information from a clinical interview by a trained clinician. In this respect, the BDI-II is positively correlated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with a Pearson r of 0.71, showing good agreement. The test was also shown to have a high one-week test–retest reliability (Pearson r =0.93), suggesting that it was not overly sensitive to daily variations in mood.[12] The test also has high internal consistency (α=.91).[9]

Impact[edit]

Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Pc

The development of the BDI was an important event in psychiatry and psychology; it represented a shift in health care professionals' view of depression from a Freudian, psychodynamic perspective, to one guided by the patient's own thoughts or 'cognitions'.[3] It also established the principle that instead of attempting to develop a psychometric tool based on a possibly invalid theory, self-report questionnaires when analysed using techniques such as factor analysis can suggest theoretical constructs.

The BDI was originally developed to provide a quantitative assessment of the intensity of depression. Because it is designed to reflect the depth of depression, it can monitor changes over time and provide an objective measure for judging improvement and the effectiveness or otherwise of treatment methods.[13] The instrument remains widely used in research; in 1998, it had been used in over 2000 empirical studies.[14] It has been translated into multiple European languages as well as Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Persian,[15] and Xhosa.[16]

Limitations[edit]

Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Windows 10

The BDI suffers from the same problems as other self-report inventories, in that scores can be easily exaggerated or minimized by the person completing them. Like all questionnaires, the way the instrument is administered can have an effect on the final score. If a patient is asked to fill out the form in front of other people in a clinical environment, for instance, social expectations have been shown to elicit a different response compared to administration via a postal survey.[17]

In participants with concomitant physical illness the BDI's reliance on physical symptoms such as fatigue may artificially inflate scores due to symptoms of the illness, rather than of depression.[18] In an effort to deal with this concern Beck and his colleagues developed the 'Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care' (BDI-PC), a short screening scale consisting of seven items from the BDI-II considered to be independent of physical function. Unlike the standard BDI, the BDI-PC produces only a binary outcome of 'not depressed' or 'depressed' for patients above a cutoff score of 4.[19]

Although designed as a screening device rather than a diagnostic tool, the BDI is sometimes used by health care providers to reach a quick diagnosis.[20]

The BDI is copyrighted; a fee must be paid for each copy used. There is no evidence that the BDI-II is more valid or reliable than other depression scales,[21] and public domain scales such as the Patient Health Questionnaire – Nine Item (PHQ-9) have been studied as a useful tool.[22]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ abcBeck AT (1972). Depression: Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN0-8122-1032-8.
  2. ^Kovacs, M. (1992). Children's Depression Inventory. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
  3. ^ abMcGraw Hill Publishing Company 'Test developer profile: Aaron T. Beck'.Retrieved on 2009-02-24
  4. ^Allen JP (2003). 'An Overview of Beck's Cognitive Theory of Depression in Contemporary Literature'. Retrieved 2004-02-24.
  5. ^Brown GP, Hammen CL, Craske MG, Wickens TD (August 1995). 'Dimensions of dysfunctional attitudes as vulnerabilities to depressive symptoms'. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 104 (3): 431–5. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.104.3.431. PMID7673566. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  6. ^Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J (June 1961). 'An inventory for measuring depression'. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 4 (6): 561–71. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. PMID13688369.
  7. ^Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG J (1988). 'Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory Twenty-five years of evaluation'. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 8: 77–100. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5.
  8. ^Moran PW, Lambert MJ (1983). 'A review of current assessment tools for monitoring changes in depression'. In Lambert MS, Christensen ER, DeJulio S (eds.). The Assessment of Psychotherapy Outcomes. New York: Wiley.
  9. ^ abcBeck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W (December 1996). 'Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients'. Journal of Personality Assessment. 67 (3): 588–97. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13. PMID8991972. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  10. ^Ambrosini PJ, Metz C, Bianchi MD, Rabinovich H, Undie A (January 1991). 'Concurrent validity and psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory in outpatient adolescents'. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 30 (1): 51–7. doi:10.1097/00004583-199101000-00008. PMID2005064. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  11. ^https://www.psychcongress.com/saundras-corner/scales-screenersdepression/beck-depression-inventory-ii-bdi-ii
  12. ^Beck AT, Steer RA and Brown GK (1996) 'Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II'. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
  13. ^Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M (1961). 'Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)'. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 4 (6): 561–571. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. PMID13688369.
  14. ^Richter, P; J Werner; A Heerlein; A Kraus; H Sauer (1998). 'On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review'. Psychopathology. 31 (3): 160–8. doi:10.1159/000066239. ISSN0254-4962. PMID9636945.
  15. ^'Literature available on Psychiatric Assessment Instruments translated in non-English languages: TBDI Section'. Victorian Transcultural Psychiatry Unit. December 2005. Archived from the original on July 19, 2008. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
  16. ^Steele GI (October 2006). 'The development and validation of the Xhosa translations of the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Hopelessness Scale'. biblioteca universia. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
  17. ^Bowling A (September 2005). 'Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality'. Journal of public health (Oxford, England). 27 (3): 281–91. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi031. PMID15870099. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  18. ^Moore MJ, Moore PB, Shaw PJ (October 1998). 'Mood disturbances in motor neurone disease'. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 160 Suppl 1: S53–6. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00203-2. PMID9851650.
  19. ^Steer RA, Cavalieri TA, Leonard DM, Beck AT (1999). 'Use of the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care to screen for major depression disorders'. General hospital psychiatry. 21 (2): 106–11. doi:10.1016/S0163-8343(98)00070-X. PMID10228890. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  20. ^Hersen M, Turner SM, Beidel DC (2007). Adult Psychopathology and Diagnosis (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 301–302. ISBN978-0-471-74584-6.
  21. ^ZimmermanM. Using scales to monitor symptoms and treatment of depression (measurement based care). In UpToDate, Rose, BD (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2011.
  22. ^Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (September 2001). 'The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure'. J Gen Intern Med. 16 (9): 606–13. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PMC1495268. PMID11556941.

Further reading[edit]

  • Beck A.T. (1988). 'Beck Hopelessness Scale.' The Psychological Corporation.
  • Craven J, Rodin G, Littlefield C (1988). 'renal dialysis'. Int J Psychiatry Med. 18 (4): 365–374. doi:10.2190/M1TX-V1EJ-E43L-RKLF. PMID3235282.

Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download

External links[edit]

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beck_Depression_Inventory&oldid=897231362'

Beck Depression Inventory Pdf Download Pdf

Beck Depression Inventory Inventory - 2nd Edition (BDI-II) Authors
Aaron T. Beck, Robert A. Steer, and Gregory K. Brown Background and Development:
The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression as listed in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; 1994). This new revised edition replaces the BDI and the BDI-1A, and includes items intending to index symptoms of severe depression, which would require hospitalization. Items have been changed to indicate increases or decreases in sleep and appetite, items labeled body image, work difficulty, weight loss, and somatic preoccupation were replaced with items labeled agitation, concentration difficulty and loss of energy, and many statements were reworded resulting in a substantial revision of the original BDI and BDI-1A. When presented with the BDI-II, a patient is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past two weeks, to more accurately correspond to the DSM-IV criteria. Each of the 21 items corresponding to a symptom of depression is summed to give a single score for the BDI-II. There is a four-point scale for each item ranging from 0 to 3. On two items (16 and 18) there are seven options to indicate either an increase or decrease of appetite and sleep. Cut score guidelines for the BDI-II are given with the recommendation that thresholds be adjusted based on the characteristics of the sample, and the purpose for use of the BDI-II. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. BDI has been used for 35 years to identify and assess depressive symptoms, and has been reported to be highly reliable regardless of the population. It has a high coefficient
alpha, (.80) its construct validity has been established, and it is able to differentiate depressed from non-depressed patients. For the BDI-II the coefficient alphas (.92 for outpatients and .93 for the college students) were higher than those for the BDI- 1A (.8 6). The correlations for the corrected item-total were significant at .05 level (with a Bonferroni adjustment), for both the outpatient and the college student samples. Testretest reliability was studied using the responses of 26 outpatients who were tested at first and second therapy sessions one week apart. There was a correlation of .93, which was significant at p < .001. The mean scores of the first and second total scores were comparable with a paired t (25)=1.08, which was not significant. Validity: One of the main objectives of this new version of the BDI was to have it conform more closely to the diagnostic criteria for depression, and items were added, eliminated and reworded to specifically assess the symptoms of depression listed in the DSM-IV and thus increase the content validity of the measure. With regard to construct validity, the convergent validity of the BDI-II was assessed by administration of the BDI-1A and the BDI-II to two sub-samples of outpatients (N=191). The order of presentation was counterbalanced and at least one other measure was administered between these two versions of the BDI, yielding a correlation of .93 (p<.001) and means of 18.92 (SD = 11.32) and 21.888 (SD = 12.69) the mean BDI-II score being 2.96 points higher than the BDI-1A. A calibration study of the two scales was also conducted, and these results are available in the BDI-II manual. Consistent with the comparison of mean differences, the BDI-II scores are 3 points higher than the BDI-1A scores in the middle of the scale. Factorial Validity has been established by the inter-correlations of the 21 items calculated from the sample responses. Assessment of the Measure in Elderly Populations
The normative sample included 500 outpatients from rural and suburban locations. All patients were diagnosed according to DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria were used to investigate the psychometric characteristics of BDI-II. The group was comprised of 63%
women, and 37% men, the mean age was 37.20 years, range of 13-86 years. The racial/ethnic makeup was 91% White, 4% African American, 4% Asian American, and 1% Hispanic. A student sample of 120 college students in Canada served as a comparative
normal
group.
Sharp and Lipsky (2002) report that psychometric data on the BDI are mixed so the BDI may not be the best screening measure for elderly patients. Assessment of the Measure in Minority Populations
No studies pertaining to the assessment of the BDI in minority populations have been found. Design Strengths and Weaknesses:
The BDI-II is intended to assess the severity of depression in psychiatrically diagnosed adults and adolescents 13 years of age and older. It is not meant to serve as an instrument of diagnosis, but rather to identify the presence and severity of symptoms consistent with the criteria of the DSM-IV. The authors warn against the use of this instrument as a sole diagnostic measure, as depressive symptoms may be part of other primary diagnostic disorders. References:
Beck, AT, CH Ward, M Mendelson, J Mock, and J Erbaugh. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4: 561-571. Beck, AT, Steer RA. (1984). Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol. Nov; 40(6):1365-7. Beck, AT, Rial WY, Rickets K.( 1974). Short form of depression inventory: crossvalidation. Psychol Rep. Jun; 34(3):1184-6.
Sharp, LK, and MS Lipsky.( 2002). Screening for Depression across the lifespan: A review of measures for use in primary care settings. Am. Fam. Physician 66 (6): 10011008.




broken image